Hirsch Reveals CCST Mistakes re: Health Effects of Smart Meters

Hirsch reveals California Commission on Science and Technology (CCST) used flawed industry report to determine findings about smart meters: Health Effects of Smart Meters (SDT)

For video interview w/Hirsch re: CCST report mistakes:

Click here: YouTube – DanielHirschSmartMeters

  • Hirsch review, showing smart meters up to 160 X higher exposures than cell phones

  • CCST used flawed power industry report comparing smart meters to cell phones

  • Needs correction in their final paper

http://www.smartmeterdangers.org/index.php/position-statements/87-ccst-corrections

 

Note by SDT: CCST is not an independent source. US Dept of Energy, crafter and funder of smart meter program is their affiliate. Therefore, the CA state legislature erred in asking CCST to determine health effects of smart meters. This can well explain why industry reports and data were focused on by CCST and despite finding broad research gaps (noted by National Academy of Science), CCST found the [obsolete] FCC standard for radiofrequency radiation to be adequate. We call on CCST to revise its Health Effects of Smart Meters (2011) report or for the California state legislature to denounce it.

 

The CCST Report:

Health Effects of Smart Meters, California Council for Science and Technology, CCST, Jan., 2011 (Note: Nonprofit affiliated with US Dept of Energy, architect of Smart Meter Program in USA).
 
Even though CCST noted significant research gaps and that current FCC standards covered only thermal exposures not applicable to rf radiation, CCST did not recommend improving the FCC radiation standards nor did it suggest use of the precautionary principle w/ regard to smart meters, rf radiation, and health. Some experts feel this report did not adequately take into consideration existing research and reports pertaining to dangers of smart meters or rf radiation nor an increasing global public outcry related to rf health effects, while citing industry studies and language. We look forward to all the public comments being published on the CCST website, including those below. (SmartMeterDangers.org)
 

"Many smart meters are close to beds, kitchens, playrooms, and similar locations. These wireless systems are never off, and the exposure is not voluntary. The smart meters are being forced on citizens everywhere. Based on this, the inauguration of smart meters with grudging and involuntary exposure of millions to billions of human beings to pulsed microwave radiation should immediately be prohibited until ’the red flag’ can be hauled down once and for all."

Havas Report on Smart Meters for CCST   (Canada)

We have evidence that pulsed microwave frequencies …are more harmful than continuous wave and yet this is not considered in the FCC guidelines (Reno 1975).
With more frequencies being used, with the levels of radiation increasing, and with so little research on the long-term, low-level effects of this technologywe are creating a potential time bomb. If smart meters are
placed on every home, they will contribute significantly to our exposure and this is both unwise and unsafe.
Dr. Magda Havas, BSc, PhD (Havas Report on Smart Meters for CCST, Oct. 2010)

http://www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Havas-Report-CCST-Smart-Meters.pdf

http://www.magdahavas.com/2011/01/18/havas-report-on-smart-meters-for-ccst/

David O. Carpenter, PhD on Smart Meters and CCST Report (USA)

Cindy Sage Your Health and Fitness Radio Show Interview Re: CCST Report  (USA)

Daniel Hirsch on CCST Report w/ corrections

For video interview w/Hirsch re: CCST mistakes:

Click here: YouTube – DanielHirschSmartMeters

When two of the most central errors are corrected – the failure to take into account duty cycles of cell phones and microwave ovens and the failure to utilize the same units (they should compare everything in terms of average whole body exposure) the cumulative whole body exposure from a Smart Meter at 3 feet appears to be approximately two orders of magnitude higher than that of a
cell phone
, rather than two orders of magnitude lower. [emphasis by SMD] (Hirsch)

A Collection of Expert Letters on CCST Report

 

More From Scientists and Experts:

Andrew Goldsworthy, PhD on smart meters  (UK)

Imperial College London, Department of Biological Sciences (retired)

Comments are closed.

Copyright SmartMeterDangers.org 2011-2014